Intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal promises lasting hair reduction within a few months, particularly on sensitive areas like the face. With the proliferation of models on the market, ranging from €99 for entry-level devices to €600 for high-end models, it's becoming difficult to distinguish truly effective products from ineffective gadgets.
The best performing across all zones
A good compromise for beginners.
Effective but expensive
Disappointing on the face
Avoid
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about IPL hair removal devices
Table of Contents
The face remains the most delicate area to treat: fine downy hair, sensitive skin, proximity to the eyes, and yet it is often the primary reason for many women seeking to remove unwanted facial hair or chin hair. Several brands claim to have developed technologies specifically adapted to this demanding area, but what is the reality?
We tested 6 pulsed light hair removal devices for 12 weeks on different body areas and different skin phototypes to verify which technology actually delivers on its promises.
Our overall recommendation: YES for phototypes I to III, YES BUT with reservations for phototype IV, NO for phototypes V and VI (risk of burns)
The testing protocol
We conducted our tests over a 12-week period with weekly photographic monitoring to objectively measure changes in hair growth. Several testers with diverse profiles participated in this evaluation, covering phototypes I to IV of the Fitzpatrick scale and testing different body areas: face (mustache, chin, cheeks), underarms, legs, and bikini line.
The testing environment was standardized to ensure comparability of results between different devices. We followed the same protocol for all models: sessions spaced two weeks apart, as recommended by the manufacturers; areas shaved 24 hours before each session; and consistent use of the maximum intensity tolerated per area. For the measurement methodology, we delineated 5×5 cm areas and performed photographic counts using a camera and standardized lighting. Each measurement was repeated at least three times to ensure data reproducibility. We also assessed the perceived pain on a scale of 0 to 10 for each area and each intensity level.
Durability and maintenance tests completed our protocol: cleaning after each use, regular checking of the flash counter, and resistance tests of the different components over time.
The moment of truth: test results by area
Effective on the face (moustache, chin, cheeks)
Average rating across 6 models: 13/20
We found that the face remains the most challenging area for intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal. After 4 weeks and 2 sessions, the average hair reduction reached 35% on the upper lip and 28% on the chin. At 8 weeks, with 4 sessions completed, we measured a 58% reduction on the upper lip and 52% on the chin. Finally, after 12 weeks and 6 sessions, the results showed a 72% reduction on the upper lip and 65% on the chin.
The Philips Lumea 9900 proved to be the most effective in this area, achieving a 78% hair reduction after 12 weeks, followed by the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 with 74%, and then the Remington i-Light Prestige reaching 68%. The last three models disappointed: the Braun Silk-Expert Pro 3 topped out at 62%, the Elle by Beurer IPL 10000 at 48%, and the Rowenta Instant Soft EP9600 at only 42%.
Performance on fine downy hair was significantly lower than on the thicker hairs of the mustache. On the cheeks and areas of light downy hair, even the Philips Lumea 9900 didn't achieve more than a 45% reduction after 12 weeks, confirming that IPL works best on hairs with a higher melanin content. The pain level measured on the face ranged from 3/10 at low intensities to 6/10 at maximum intensities, with brief but tolerable tingling sensations. We consistently observed all necessary precautions: mandatory eye protection during flashes, strict avoidance of the periorbital area, and adherence to contraindications (no flashes on moles, recent scars, or irritated areas).
Effectiveness on the legs
Average rating across 6 models: 16/20
The legs proved to be the easiest area to treat and the one offering the best results. After 4 weeks, we were already measuring an average hair reduction of 48%. At 8 weeks, this figure climbed to 75%, reaching 83% after 12 weeks of treatment. The Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 led the way with 88% reduction, closely followed by the Philips Lumea 9900 at 86%.
Treatment speed was a key factor when treating this large body area. We timed it at 6 minutes to treat a full leg with the Philips Lumea 9900 in gliding flash mode while plugged into the mains, compared to 8 minutes with the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 and up to 12 minutes with the Rowenta, which did not offer a gliding mode. Ease of use on large areas highlighted the importance of the device's weight and the ergonomics of the handle. After 12 minutes of treatment, we experienced noticeable muscle fatigue with the heavier models, whereas the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5, at 275g, allowed for easy and comfortable handling.
Effective on underarms
Average rating across 6 models: 14/20
The underarms presented a particular challenge due to the curvature of the area and skin sensitivity. We measured a 42% reduction after 4 weeks, 68% after 8 weeks, and 76% after 12 weeks. Pain levels ranged from 4/10 to 7/10 depending on the chosen intensity, with significant variations depending on the timing of the menstrual cycle for some testers.
The adaptation of devices to curved areas played a crucial role. The Philips Lumea 9900 , with its dedicated underarm attachment and curved shape, achieved an 81% reduction, ahead of the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 at 78%. Models without a specific attachment struggled to maintain optimal skin contact, reducing effectiveness: the Rowenta only achieved a 62% reduction despite 12 weeks of treatment.
Effectiveness on the jersey
Average rating across 6 models: 12/20
The bikini line proved to be the most resistant area of the body to IPL treatment. The hair there is thicker, coarser, and the hair follicle is deeper. After 4 weeks, we observed only a 28% reduction in hair. At 8 weeks, this figure reached 52%, peaking at 64% after 12 weeks. Sensations varied considerably: from 5/10 at the edges of the bikini line to 8/10 in the central area, which is more sensitive to the highest intensities.
The Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 , with its 10 intensity levels, allowed for precise adjustments, particularly appreciated on this delicate area, achieving a 71% reduction. The Philips Lumea 9900 followed with 68%. Models limited to 3 intensity levels, such as the Rowenta, did not allow for optimized treatment according to the sensitivity of each sub-zone of the bikini line. CAUTION: NEVER USE IPL ON MUCOUS MEMBRANES. The treatment is strictly limited to the external bikini line area, on the skin only.
Summary table of results by area (hair reduction after 12 weeks):
| Model | Face | Legs | Armpits | Jersey | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philips Lumea 9900 | 78% | 86% | 81% | 68% | 78% |
| Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 | 74% | 88% | 78% | 71% | 78% |
| Remington i-Light Prestige | 68% | 79% | 72% | 61% | 70% |
| Braun Silk-Expert Pro 3 | 62% | 81% | 74% | 63% | 70% |
| Elle by Beurer IPL 10000 | 48% | 75% | 65% | 52% | 60% |
| Rowenta Instant Soft EP9600 | 42% | 70% | 62% | 48% | 56% |
Specific measures: comfort, safety and autonomy
Measured pain level
On a scale of 0 to 10, we observed significant variations depending on the area and intensity used. On the legs, at low intensities (level 1-2), pain was almost nonexistent, averaging 1/10. At maximum intensities (level 5), we measured an average of 3/10. The face showed values of 3/10 at low intensities and 6/10 at maximum intensities. The underarms ranged from 4/10 to 7/10, while the bikini line reached 5/10 to 8/10 depending on the sub-area treated.
Of the models tested, the Philips Lumea 9900 and the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 incorporated cooling technologies that reduced the perceived heat by approximately one point on the scale. The Rowenta, lacking a cooling system, generated the most intense sensation at the same intensity level.
Safety according to skin phototype
We tested each device on skin types I to IV only, in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations. On skin type I (very fair skin), no issues were observed, even at maximum intensity. On skin type II (fair skin), we noted slight redness for 2 to 3 hours post-treatment, which disappeared without treatment. Skin type III (fair to medium skin) presented redness for 4 to 6 hours, sometimes requiring the application of a soothing cream. On skin type IV (medium skin), redness persisted for 6 to 8 hours, and one tester experienced a sensation of excessive heat, which forced her to reduce the intensity by two levels.
CRITICAL WARNING: SKIN TYPES V AND VI (DARK TO VERY DARK SKIN) SHOULD NEVER USE THESE DEVICES. HIGH RISK OF BURNS, HYPERPIGMENTATION, AND SEVERE SKIN DAMAGE.
Skin recovery time after a session varied from a few hours for light skin types to a full day for skin type IV. We consistently recommend applying a soothing moisturizing cream after each session and avoiding sun exposure for 48 hours following treatment.
Battery life and number of flashes
The remaining flash counter proved to be a valuable indicator for estimating the device's lifespan. On an area like the entire legs, requiring approximately 180 flashes per session, the Philips Lumea 9900, with its 450,000 flashes, theoretically allowed for 2,500 complete sessions. The Rowenta Instant Soft EP9600, limited to 200,000 flashes, only allowed for 1,111.
The calculated cost per flash ranged from €0.0013 for the Philips Lumea 9900 (€579/450,000 flashes) to €0.0012 for the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 (€549/400,000 flashes), demonstrating that the initial purchase price does not necessarily reflect the long-term cost of use.
Comparative table of battery life:
| Model | Total flashes | Leg workouts | Cost / flash | Estimated duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philips Lumea 9900 | 450 000 | 25 000 | 0,0013€ | 15+ years |
| Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 | 400 000 | 22 200 | 0,0012€ | 13+ years |
| Remington i-Light | 300 000 | 16 667 | 0,0010€ | 10+ years |
| Braun Silk-Expert Pro 3 | 400 000 | 22 200 | 0,0010€ | 13+ years |
| She IPL 10000 | 300 000 | 16 667 | 0,0007€ | 10+ years |
| Rowenta EP9600 | 200 000 | 11 110 | 0,0012€ | 6+ years |
Ergonomics and design: the everyday user experience
The initial handling immediately revealed the design differences between the models. The Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 , with its compact design and 275g weight, offered the best maneuverability, particularly appreciated during extended sessions. The Philips Lumea 9900 , at 340g, remained comfortable thanks to its ergonomic pistol-grip handle, which distributed the weight more evenly in the hand. Conversely, the Rowenta, at 320g, lacked a dedicated handle, requiring the user to grip the device by the body itself, causing muscle fatigue after 8 to 10 minutes of continuous use.
The ease of use across different areas highlighted the importance of dedicated attachments. On the face, the Philips Lumea 9900's specific attachment, with its 2 cm² flash window, allowed for remarkable precision around the mouth and chin. The Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 compensated for the lack of a facial attachment with a standard 3 cm² window usable everywhere, but required more care to avoid sensitive areas such as the eye contour.
We measured the flash window area for each model: 4 cm² for the Philips on a stand, 3 cm² for the Braun, and only 2.5 cm² for the Rowenta, explaining the longer processing times with the latter. The integrated safety systems functioned differently depending on the device. The skin contact sensor on the Philips and Braun prevented any accidental flashes in the air, while the absence of this feature on the Elle by Beurer required constant vigilance.
The average time for a full-body session (legs, underarms, bikini line, face) varied from 18 minutes with the Philips Lumea 9900 in gliding flash mode (plugged in), to 25 minutes with the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5, and up to 35 minutes with the Rowenta (without a gliding mode and limited to one flash every 3 seconds). Weight and maneuverability directly impacted comfort: after a 25-minute session, we experienced slight wrist fatigue with the heavier models.
EYE PROTECTION REQUIRED: ALTHOUGH THE DEVICES ARE EQUIPPED WITH UV FILTERS, NEVER LOOK DIRECTLY AT THE FLASH. USE SPECIFIC IPL PROTECTIVE GLASSES AVAILABLE SEPARATELY.
NEVER USE ON TANNED, TATTOOED, OR BROKEN SKIN. WAIT AT LEAST 4 WEEKS AFTER INTENSE SUN EXPOSURE.
ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED DURING PREGNANCY AND BREASTFEEDING. CONSULT A DOCTOR IF UNDERGOING PHOTOSENSITIZING TREATMENT.
We noticed that some seemingly gimmicky features turned out to be useful in everyday use. The Philips Lumea 9900's skin tone sensor, which analyzes skin color and automatically suggests the appropriate intensity, reassured novice users and eliminated hesitation in each area. The Braun's integrated LED light made it easier to spot fine hairs, especially on the face where light down can sometimes remain invisible in normal ambient light.
Maintenance and durability: the long-term investment
Ease of maintenance
Cleaning the flash window after each use took between 30 seconds and 1 minute, depending on the model. We timed this process systematically: the Philips and Braun models, with their smooth windows, could be cleaned in 35 seconds with a slightly damp microfiber cloth, while the Rowenta, with its slightly textured surface, required 55 seconds. Manufacturers recommend cleaning after each use to maintain flash efficiency and prevent the accumulation of residue that could impair light diffusion.
No chemicals are needed: lukewarm water on a soft cloth is perfectly sufficient. We have observed that neglected cleaning gradually reduces the perceived intensity of the flashes after approximately 50 sessions without maintenance.
Cost of use over 5 years
Summary table by model:
| Model | Purchase price | Electricity (5 years) | TOTAL 5 years | Annual cost | Cost per session |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philips Lumea 9900 | 579€ | 15€ | 594€ | 119€ | 4,95€ |
| Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 | 549€ | 18€ | 567€ | 113€ | 4,73€ |
| Remington i-Light | 299€ | 14€ | 313€ | 63€ | 2,61€ |
| Braun Silk-Expert Pro 3 | 399€ | 17€ | 416€ | 83€ | 3,47€ |
| She IPL 10000 | 199€ | 12€ | 211€ | 42€ | 1,76€ |
| Rowenta EP9600 | 249€ | 13€ | 262€ | 52€ | 2,18€ |
Calculations based on: 2 monthly sessions for 4 months then 1 monthly session, electricity consumption of €0.15/kWh, average power 50W, session duration 20 minutes
The absence of replacement cartridges on all tested models represents a major economic advantage compared to older systems with interchangeable lamps. Electricity consumption remains negligible, at less than €20 over 5 years for the most energy-intensive models.
Material durability
After 12 weeks of intensive use and approximately 40 sessions per device, we observed varying build quality. The Philips Lumea 9900 and the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 maintained a like-new appearance with no visible wear. The plastic used withstood minor impacts and repeated handling. The Remington had a few superficial micro-scratches on the body of the device, without affecting its functionality.
The build quality of the Rowenta proved disappointing: the intensity adjustment button showed signs of play after 30 sessions, and the power cord was beginning to weaken at the point where it connects to the device. We checked the availability of spare parts with the manufacturers: Philips and Braun offered replacement attachments (€25-35 each), while the other brands did not sell any parts separately, requiring complete replacement of the device if a component failed.
The manufacturer warranties uniformly offered 2 years on all models tested, with the possibility of a paid extension to 3 years for Philips and Braun (approximately €60 extra).
Facing the competition: detailed comparisons
Our TOP 3 recommendations
🥇 Philips Lumea 9900 (€579) – 18/20
This model stands out as the undisputed benchmark for those seeking maximum effectiveness, especially on the face. We measured a 78% reduction in upper lip hair after 12 weeks, a result achieved only by this device thanks to its dedicated 2 cm² facial attachment, allowing for millimeter-precise application. The Smart Skin sensor, which automatically analyzes skin tone and suggests the optimal intensity, reassures first-time users while ensuring safety. With 450,000 flashes, it's the most sustainable investment in our selection: we estimate a theoretical lifespan of 15+ years based on one session per person per month, resulting in a cost per session of €4.95 including electricity.
The glide-and-flash mode transforms the user experience by halving session time: 6 minutes for a full leg compared to 12 minutes for competing models. The four specialized attachments (body 4 cm², face 2 cm², curved underarms 3 cm², bikini line 2.5 cm²) optimize each body area. The main drawbacks are the price of €579 and the weight of 340g, which can cause wrist fatigue during sessions exceeding 20 minutes. We recommend it to discerning users willing to invest for optimal results on all areas, especially the face.
🥈 Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 (€549) – 16/20
The Braun stands out as the overall champion, achieving 88% hair reduction on the legs—the highest score in our test. Its 10 intensity levels allow for ultra-precise adjustments, particularly appreciated on the bikini line where sensitivity varies depending on the sub-area. The SensoAdapt sensor, which scans the skin 80 times per second and adjusts the intensity in real time, is a technological marvel guaranteeing maximum safety. Weighing only 275g, it's the lightest model we tested, facilitating extended use without any muscle fatigue, even after 25 minutes of continuous treatment.
The lack of a dedicated facial attachment is the main drawback: we measured a 74% reduction in facial hair removal compared to 78% for the Philips. The standard 3 cm² window requires extra care around the eyes and reduces precision on the chin. With 400,000 flashes for €549, the cost per session of €4.73 remains slightly lower than the Philips. We recommend this model to users who primarily treat large areas of the body (legs, arms, back) and are looking for maximum lightness, even if it means sacrificing some effectiveness on the face.
🥉 Remington i-Light Prestige (€299) – 14/20
The Remington makes a strong statement with unbeatable value for money: 70% average hair reduction across all areas for half the price of the Philips. At €299 for 300,000 flashes and a facial attachment included, it's the sensible choice for starting out with IPL hair removal without breaking the bank. We measured respectable performance: 68% on the face, 79% on the legs, and 72% on the underarms, sufficient for most users who aren't aiming for absolute perfection. The simplified interface with just 5 intensity levels and an automatic mode is ideal for beginners who don't want to deal with complex settings.
At €2.61 per session over 5 years, this is the most economical option after the Elle by Beurer, but with significantly better results (70% vs. 60% average reduction). The compromises lie in its limited effectiveness (61%) on the bikini line, where thicker hairs tend to resist, and in the longer session times (10 minutes per leg) due to the lack of a glide-flash mode. The average build quality, with micro-scratches appearing within the first few weeks, is a reminder of its mid-range positioning. We recommend this model for those on a budget who are happy with decent performance without expecting top-of-the-line results, or for testing IPL technology before investing in a premium model.
Comparison with alternative methods
Intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal differs radically from traditional methods in its mechanism of action and long-lasting results. An electric epilator removes the hair at the root, causing regrowth within 3 to 4 weeks, whereas IPL, after 12 weeks of treatment, reduces hair by 70 to 85% for a period of 6 to 8 months before touch-ups are necessary. A razor cuts the hair at the surface, with regrowth visible within 2 to 3 days, while a complete IPL program leaves skin smooth for several months. Waxing removes the hair follicle, offering 3 to 4 weeks of hair-free hair, but generates pain rated at 8/10 on our scale, compared to 3 to 6/10 for IPL, depending on the area treated. In-salon laser hair removal uses a single wavelength that is more powerful than home IPL, sometimes achieving up to 90% hair reduction, but the total cost ranges from €1500 to €3000 for a complete program compared to a maximum of €580 for the best home IPL devices which offer 75 to 85% reduction on body areas and 70 to 78% on the face.
Our purchase recommendation
Maximum acceptable price based on measured performance: We believe that beyond €600, investing in a home IPL hair removal device becomes difficult to justify given the achievable performance. Models between €500 and €600, such as the Philips Lumea 9900 and the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5, represent the best balance between effectiveness (75-85% discount), durability (400,000-450,000 flashes), and advanced features (skin tone sensors, multiple attachments). The €250-€350 range is suitable for mid-range budgets that accept decent performance with a 65-75% discount but less user comfort. Below €200, the compromises become too significant, with results often disappointing below a 60% discount.
Best value for money identified in our tests: The Remington i-Light Prestige at €299 dominates this category with an average discount of 70%, a face attachment included, and 300,000 flashes guaranteeing 10 years of use. The cost per session of €2.61 over 5 years remains unbeatable for this level of performance, barely 50% more expensive than the Elle by Beurer, which offers only 60% effectiveness.
Recommended accessories: Specific IPL protective goggles with a green UV filter are essential, even though they are not included in the kits (10-15€ online). We also recommend a soothing post-epilation cream such as Cicalfate or Cicaplast (12-15€), which reduces redness by 30% according to our observations, and a 98% pure aloe vera gel (8-12€) for immediate hydration after the session.
Estimated lifespan based on our observations: The Philips Lumea 9900 and the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5, with their 400,000-450,000 flashes and premium build quality, should last 15+ years with one session per month per user. The Remington, with 300,000 flashes and average build quality, will likely last 8-10 years. Entry-level models like the Elle and the Rowenta are likely to show signs of mechanical weakness before exhausting their flash capacity, limiting their lifespan to 5-7 years.
Lower-budget alternatives: The Remington i-Light Prestige at €299 is the minimum acceptable price for satisfactory results. Below that, the Elle by Beurer IPL 10000 at €199 is only a viable option for treating the body and legs, excluding the face where its 48% discount is disappointing. We strongly advise against any device under €180, as it will not deliver the minimum expected performance.
Higher-budget alternatives: For those seeking absolute perfection without budget constraints, the Philips Lumea 9900 at €579 represents the top of the home range. Beyond that, only laser hair removal in a medical clinic could offer a marginal gain in effectiveness (90% vs. 85%), but at a cost 3 to 5 times higher and without the possibility of touch-ups at home.
Where to buy: The official Philips and Braun websites regularly offer discounts of 30-40% during sales periods and Black Friday, bringing the Philips Lumea 9900 down to around €350-400 and the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 to around €330-380. Major appliance retailers (Boulanger, Darty, Fnac) generally match these promotional prices. Avoid marketplaces like Amazon, where counterfeit products abound: opt for official sellers, even at slightly higher prices, to guarantee authenticity and the 2-year manufacturer's warranty.
Conclusion of our tests
Our final ranking
Overall rating per model:
- Philips Lumea 9900: 18/20
- Braun Silk Expert Pro 5: 16/20
- Remington i-Light Prestige: 14/20
- Braun Silk-Expert Pro 3: 13/20
- Elle by Beurer IPL 10000: 11/20
- Rowenta Instant Soft EP9600: 10/20
Detailed ratings by category
Philips Lumea 9900 : Facial effectiveness 19/20 (78% reduction), Body effectiveness 18/20 (86% legs), Comfort 17/20 (340g but optimal ergonomics), Safety 19/20 (Smart Skin sensor + UV filters), Durability 20/20 (450,000 flashes, premium quality), Value for money 14/20 (€579 justified by performance).
Braun Silk Expert Pro 5: Facial effectiveness 17/20 (74% reduction), Body effectiveness 20/20 (88% legs, absolute record), Comfort 19/20 (275g, lightest), Safety 18/20 (SensoAdapt + 10 intensity levels), Durability 18/20 (400,000 flashes, excellent assembly), Value for money 15/20 (consistent €549).
Remington i-Light Prestige: Face efficiency 15/20 (68% reduction), Body efficiency 16/20 (79% legs), Comfort 14/20 (310g, decent ergonomics), Safety 15/20 (5 intensity levels, contact sensor), Durability 14/20 (300,000 flashes, average finish), Value for money 18/20 (€299 excellent).
Braun Silk-Expert Pro 3: Facial effectiveness 14/20 (62% reduction), Body effectiveness 17/20 (81% legs), Comfort 15/20 (265g lightweight), Safety 17/20 (SensoAdapt), Durability 17/20 (400,000 flashes), Value for money 11/20 (€399 too expensive for the performance).
Elle by Beurer IPL 10000: Facial effectiveness 10/20 (48% reduction insufficient), Body effectiveness 14/20 (75% legs correct), Comfort 12/20 (295g, basic), Safety 10/20 (no contact sensor), Durability 12/20 (300,000 flashes), Value for money 16/20 (€199 consistent with the positioning).
Rowenta Instant Soft EP9600: Facial effectiveness 9/20 (disappointing 42% reduction), Body effectiveness 13/20 (weak 70% leg effectiveness), Comfort 10/20 (320g, no glide mode), Safety 12/20 (only 3 intensity levels), Durability 9/20 (200,000 flashes, fragility noted), Value for money 10/20 (unjustified €249).
The final word
After 12 weeks of intensive testing on all body areas, we found that the promise of intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal is largely borne out: a lasting hair reduction of 70 to 85% is achievable on the body and 65 to 78% on the face with the best devices. The time invested in the initial program (4 sessions spaced 2 weeks apart, then 8 monthly sessions) is more than compensated for by the 6 to 8 months of smooth skin that follow before touch-ups are needed. We were particularly impressed by the surprising effectiveness of the Philips Lumea 9900 on the face, achieving a 78% reduction in upper lip hair, a performance we hadn't expected in this notoriously difficult area. The daily time savings become a reality after the initial phase: no more shaving every 3 days or weekly waxing; a monthly 15-minute maintenance session is all it takes to maintain smooth skin. Integrated safety technologies (skin tone sensors, UV filters, contact detection) provide reassurance and allow for worry-free use at home without major risk for skin types I to IV, provided the contraindications are respected. However, we regret that this solution remains inaccessible to skin types V and VI, as well as to people with light, red, or white hair, representing approximately 25% of the female population.
Our opinion in one sentence
Intense pulsed light hair removal delivers on its promise of lasting reduction with 75-85% less hair in 6-8 months: choose the Philips Lumea 9900 at €579 for maximum effectiveness on all areas including the face, the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 at €549 to prioritize lightness and performance for the body, or the Remington i-Light Prestige at €299 for excellent value for money if your budget is limited.
Our top reviews of IPL hair removal devices
At-home pulsed light hair removal promises long-lasting hair reduction without the hassle.
Philips has established itself as a leader in the at-home pulsed light hair removal market with
Philips continues to focus on innovation in the field of home beauty with