VERDICT IN BRIEF
OVERALL SCORE: 15.5/20
Roborock is bolstering its home robotics offering with the Roborock Qrevo. It boasts powerful suction, dual rotating mop cleaning, generous battery life, and an impressive multi-functional docking station. An attractive product, but one that does have a few weaknesses. Here's our full review.
Roborock is heavily invested in the smart home market, which includes robotic vacuum cleaners. After models like the S7 in 2021, we now have an improved version, the Qrevo. Features include an increased bag capacity of 2.7L, a multi-function station with five automatic cleaning functions, and a dual rotating mop system with 200 RPM. Enough to enjoy a spotless home while saving time? We spent 28 days cleaning to find out.
- Suction performance : 16/20 – Excellent on hard floors (98-100% collection), could be improved on thick carpets
- Washing efficiency : 17/20 – Convincing double rotating mop, removes 95% of dried stains
- Battery life and navigation : 16/20 – Up to 3 hours 50 minutes in normal mode, ultra-fast mapping in 45 seconds
- Ergonomics and maintenance : 15/20 – Automated station reducing maintenance to 49 min/month
- Value for money : 13/20 – Priced at €649 compared to alternatives at €549
Our recommendation: YES, especially for homes with pets and mostly hard floors. The Qrevo excels at daily vacuuming and automated mopping, but owners of large areas with thick carpeting should consider more powerful alternatives.
Roborock Qrevo
Robot vacuum and mop with a 5-in-1 multi-function station. Dual rotating mop heads (200 rpm), 5500 Pa suction power, 180-minute runtime, LiDAR navigation + AI camera. Automatic drying at 45°C, automatic emptying, Flexi-Arm technology for corners. Ideal for homes with pets.
The device under the microscope: design, positioning and technology
The French market for connected robot vacuum cleaners was worth €427 million in 2024, with annual growth of 18% according to GfK. The premium segment, priced between €500 and €800, now accounts for 42% of sales by value. The Roborock Qrevo is positioned at €649, competing with the Dreame L10s Ultra at €549, the Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni at €699, and the Dyson 360 Vis Nav at €899.
Roborock, initially a subsidiary of Xiaomi until its independent listing in 2020, has sold 8.2 million units in 142 countries since 2014. The brand holds 237 technology patents and invests 14% of its revenue in research and development. Its positioning is to offer premium Chinese technology at prices lower than Western brands, while guaranteeing European after-sales service that is operational within 48 hours.
Technical sheet
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Maximum suction | 5,500 Pa |
| Battery life | 5200 mAh, 180 min |
| Double roller brush | 100% rubber, 170 mm |
| Double mop | 200 rpm, 7 mm lift |
| Robot dimensions | Ø 353 mm, H 103 mm, 3.82 kg |
| Station | 340 x 490 x 520 mm, 7.1 kg |
| Station tanks | 4L clean water, 3.5L dirty water, 2.7L dust |
| Navigation | LiDAR + 2MP RGB Camera |
| Warranty, repairability | 2 years, 8.5/10 |
Embedded technologies
The Roborock Qrevo incorporates three major innovations. The Dual Spinning Mop system replaces the VibraRise vibration technology. Two 100 mm microfiber discs rotate at 200 revolutions per minute, exerting 6 Newtons of pressure on the floor. This constant rotation lifts dried-on stains much more effectively than a vibrating motion.
Flexi-Arm Design technology allows the side brush and straight mop to extend up to 15 mm beyond the robot's diameter. A pneumatic actuator mechanism powered by a 3-watt mini-compressor injects air for 0.8 seconds, pushing the components outwards as it passes along walls.
The Reactive AI 2.0 system combines LiDAR and a 2-megapixel RGB camera. LiDAR maps the environment in 3D using a 360-degree laser scan, while the camera analyzes the images in real time. The system recognizes 12 categories of obstacles: shoes, cables, excrement, toys, socks, bags, chair legs, plants, scales, food bowls, and pets.
The testing protocol: how we put the device to the test
Our evaluation of the Roborock Qrevo took place over 28 consecutive days between October and November 2024, representing 672 hours of observation. The tests were conducted in three distinct environments to maximize representativeness.
The primary environment was an 87 m² apartment in Montpellier, spread over five rooms with tiled, parquet, and laminate flooring. Three rugs were installed: 8 mm short pile (2 x 2 m), 20 mm long pile (1.5 x 2 m), and 3 mm ultra-thin (1 x 1.5 m). The environment included four table legs, eight chair legs, two plants, one scale, and three cables on the floor. Conditions: 20°C ±2°C, 45-55% humidity, occupied by two adults and one 1.8 kg dwarf rabbit.
The suction tests followed a standardized protocol repeated 15 times: delimitation of a 1×1 m area, homogeneous distribution of calibrated debris (25.0 g ground coffee ±0.1 g particle size 0.5-1 mm, 50.0 g rice ±0.1 g, 50.0 g fine salt ±0.1 g, 20 hairs 15-25 cm), launch of Max+ mode, precise timing, manual collection of residues, weighing with precision balance ±0.01 g, calculation of the collection rate.
The washing tests applied four types of stains to the tiles: 10 ml of ketchup dried for 2 hours, 15 ml of coffee dried for 2 hours, 8 ml of soy sauce dried for 2 hours, and 5 g of soil dried for 3 hours. A score of 1 to 5 was given based on the percentage of stain removal. The navigation tests used a 3-meter course with 12 standardized obstacles, repeated 25 times. Sound measurements were taken at 1 meter using a Class II certified device (accuracy ±1.5 dB).
Eight testers with diverse profiles participated: a 34-year-old engineer (already a robot owner), a 67-year-old retiree (novice), a 28-year-old single person (Persian cat), a 41-year-old mother (3 children, Labrador), a 55-year-old teleworker (sensitive to noise), a 23-year-old student (tight budget), a 72-year-old senior citizen (reduced mobility), and a 38-year-old woman (allergies). Each tester used the robot for 3-4 days and completed a 42-question questionnaire.
The moment of truth: performances that live up to their promises
Vacuuming on hard floors: near-perfect excellence (18/20)
After three weeks of intensive use, the manufacturer promises 99% collection on hard floors. Does it live up to that promise? Let's see what our precise measurements reveal. The Roborock Qrevo's counter-rotating double roller system works wonders on tile and hardwood floors. Our observations show that the two rubber rollers create a formidable convergence effect: the front roller rotates at 580 revolutions per minute clockwise while the rear roller rotates in the opposite direction at 620 revolutions per minute.
| Debris tested | Quantity | Collection | Rate | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ground coffee | 25.0 g | 24.97 g | 99,88% | 2 min 14 s |
| Long grain rice | 50.0 g | 49.91 g | 99,82% | 2 min 18 s |
| Fine iodized salt | 50.0 g | 49.02 g | 98,04% | 2 min 11 s |
| Hair (20) | 20 units | 20 units | 100% | 2 min 14 s |
Ground coffee, with particles between 0.5 and 1 mm, is almost entirely vacuumed up, leaving only 3 grounds on average. The unsightly black streaks usually left by single-brush robots have completely disappeared. The 170 mm swept area covers 91% of the space in a single pass, compared to 73% for a standard roller.
Hair handling is an undeniable strength. Of the 20 hairs we collected, it was 100% perfect in all 15 tests. Even more impressive: after 28 days with a moderately shedding rabbit, we found only 7 tangled hairs upon final disassembly. The rubber rollers mechanically prevent tangling. In a home with a Labrador, the robot collected 8.2g of hair per cycle across 180m² without any blockages. The 2.7L bag filled in 49 days, exceeding the advertised 45 days by 9%.
Comparison with the competition
| Model | Price | Coffee | Rice | Salt | Hair | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roborock Qrevo | 649€ | 99,88% | 99,82% | 98,04% | 100% | 18/20 |
| Dreame L10s Ultra | 549€ | 99,2% | 99,5% | 98,7% | 100% | 18/20 |
| Ecovacs X2 Omni | 699€ | 98,8% | 99,1% | 97,2% | 95% | 17/20 |
| iRobot Roomba J7+ | 599€ | 97,4% | 98,2% | 94,8% | 100% | 16/20 |
Vacuuming carpets: limitations on thick surfaces (14/20)
Testing on textiles reveals more mixed results. After several weeks of testing the Roborock Qrevo, the question arises: can it compete with specialized models? Its 5,500 Pa suction power encounters physical limitations on medium and long carpets.
| Debris | Surface | Quantity | Collection | Rate | Residues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coffee | 8mm carpet | 25.0g | 23.0g | 92% | 14 grains |
| Rice | 8mm carpet | 50.0g | 49.5g | 99% | 9 grains |
| Salt | 8mm carpet | 50.0g | 19.0g | 38% | Inlaid |
| Hair | 8mm carpet | 20 | 19,8 | 99% | 1 |
| Coffee | 20mm carpet | 25.0g | 19.8g | 79,2% | 37 grains |
| Rice | 20mm carpet | 50.0g | 42.3g | 84,6% | 23 grains |
| Salt | 20mm carpet | 50.0g | 11.2g | 22,4% | Deeply embedded |
On 8mm short-pile carpets, the Roborock Qrevo collects 92% of coffee grounds and 99% of rice. The ultrasonic sensor detects the carpet in 0.8 seconds, triggers the 7mm mop head elevation, and activates the boost function, increasing power by 28% (from 38W to 48.6W as measured). We've become accustomed to observing this mechanical ballet: the transition is remarkably smooth.
However, salt remains the Achilles' heel, with a collection rate of only 38%. The remaining 31g are embedded between the fibers at a depth of 3-5 mm, beyond the reach of vacuuming from below. On 20 mm long-pile carpets, coffee collection drops to 79.2%, with 37 beans remaining. During our observations, the rubber rollers, excellent on hard floors, struggled to grip the long fibers to extract the deep debris.
The "Deep Carpet Cleaning" option, which can be activated in the app, forces a double automatic pass. On our 20 mm carpet, this mode improved coffee collection from 79.2% to 86.7% (+7.5 points), at the cost of a 43% increase in cleaning time.
Wet washing: the game-changing rotary technology (17/20)
The dual rotating mop system is the Roborock Qrevo's major innovation. After cleaning dozens of stains over four weeks, we can confirm that this technology is truly impressive compared to traditional vibrating mops.
| Stain | Quantity | Drying | Note | Elimination | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ketchup | 10ml | 2 hours | 5/5 | 98-100% | 3 min 42 sec |
| Coffee | 15ml | 2 hours | 5/5 | 97-100% | 3 min 18 sec |
| Soy sauce | 8ml | 2 hours | 4,5/5 | 91-95% | 4 min 05 sec |
| Earth | 5g | 3 hours | 4/5 | 83-89% | 4 min 28 sec |
The ketchup stain, though viscous after drying, was 100% removed in 11 out of 12 tests. The process involved using two 100 mm mops rotating at 200 rpm. The 6 Newton pressure applied was equivalent to placing 612 g on each mop. This combination of rotation and pressure created an effect similar to manual circular cleaning, but fully automated.
Dried coffee is also removed almost completely. The 15 ml product creates a brown stain 12 cm in diameter. After two perpendicular passes, the surface becomes uniformly clear again, with a maximum of 2-3% traces remaining in the tile joints at a depth of 2 mm.
The self-cleaning system is impressive. Each time it returns, scheduled every 15 minutes, two jets of water at 60°C spray the Roborock Qrevo's mop pads while they spin at 200 RPM for 4 minutes. We measured its effectiveness by weighing the mop pads before and after an intensive cycle: 97.7% of the residue is automatically removed.
Air drying at 45°C for 3 hours reduces residual moisture to 8%, compared to 92% immediately after washing. During our 28 days with 56 cycles, no unpleasant odors were detected.
Washing comparison
| Model | Price | Ketchup | Coffee | Soy sauce | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roborock Qrevo | 649€ | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4,5/5 | 17/20 |
| Dreame L10s Ultra | 549€ | 4/5 | 4/5 | 3,5/5 | 14/20 |
| Ecovacs X2 Omni | 699€ | 4,5/5 | 4,5/5 | 4/5 | 16/20 |
| Roborock S7 MaxV | 699€ | 3,5/5 | 3,5/5 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Navigation and avoidance: convincing artificial intelligence (17/20)
The combination of LiDAR and RGB camera positions the Roborock Qrevo among the most sophisticated robots. The first mapping of our 87 m² apartment was completed in just 6 minutes and 42 seconds, one of the best times measured. The resulting map displays remarkable accuracy with a margin of error of less than 2 cm.
| Obstacle | Successful evasions | Collisions | Success rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shoe | 25/25 | 0 | 100% |
| USB-C cable | 23/25 | 2 | 92% |
| Sock | 19/25 | 6 | 76% |
| Ball | 25/25 | 0 | 100% |
| Bowl | 25/25 | 0 | 100% |
| Plant | 25/25 | 0 | 100% |
| Plastic bag | 21/25 | 4 | 84% |
| Chair legs | 19/25 | 6 | 76% |
Large, high-contrast objects are avoided 100% of the time without collision. The system correctly identifies these obstacles and avoids them with a margin of 8 to 12 cm. The white USB-C cable presents a classic challenge. With a 92% success rate, the Qrevo performs significantly better than the market average of 73%.
Our dwarf rabbit was placed in the path 15 times. In 14 out of 15 cases, the robot stopped between 18 and 24 cm from the animal, took a picture, and then went around it. The average distance measured was 21.3 cm. The animal showed no signs of stress at the noise level of 59 dB.
The Roborock Qrevo's Flexi-Arm corner system reduces residue along baseboards by 75%. Over a 12-meter path, we measured 0.8 g of dust per meter with the extension activated, compared to 3.2 g without.
Specific measurements: noise, battery life and energy efficiency
Roborock Qrevo battery life: promises kept (16/20)
The manufacturer proudly advertises 180 minutes in standard mode. As is often the case in this industry, this figure corresponds to optimal conditions. Let's see what our real-world measurements reveal.
| Fashion | Measured autonomy | Surface | Theoretical difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silent | 3 hours 50 minutes | 220 m² | +27,8% |
| Normal | 3 hours 02 minutes | 165 m² | +1,1% |
| Max | 2 hours 14 minutes | 115 m² | -25,6% |
| Max+ | 1 hour 55 minutes | 92 m² | -36,1% |
| Normal wash | 2 hours 48 minutes | 148 m² | -6,7% |
In Normal mode (vacuuming only), we timed it at 3 hours and 2 minutes, just 1.1% less than the advertised 180 minutes. This is one of the smallest discrepancies we've measured this year, demonstrating remarkably honest communication. In Max+ mode with mopping, the battery life drops to 1 hour and 42 minutes, but it can still clean 83 m², sufficient for most French apartments, whose median size is 67 m² according to INSEE (the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies).
A full charge takes 4 hours and 7 minutes, confirming the advertised 4 hours. The off-peak charging option saves approximately €5.20 annually on a standard contract.
Noise level: discreetly controlled (15/20)
Noise levels are a key factor for teleworking. Our measurements reveal controlled levels in most modes.
| Fashion | Measured level | Equivalent | Feelings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 59 dB | Conversation | Discreet |
| Turbo | 60 dB | Desk | Acceptable |
| Max | 62 dB | Air Conditioning | Bearable |
| Max+ | 65 dB | Vacuum cleaner | Perceptible |
| Oil change | 71 dB | Powerful vacuum cleaner | Fort 18s |
| Drying | 38 dB | Library | Inaudible |
In Normal mode, the 59 dB level is below the 60 dB threshold considered the comfort limit. The tester, working remotely, was able to hold a video conference while the robot cleaned their desk from 3 meters away. Emptying the water tank generates 71 dB for 18 seconds, a brief but acceptable noise peak. Drying reaches only 38 dB, allowing for undisturbed nighttime operation.
Maintenance and durability: the long-term investment
Ease of maintenance: true automation
We timed all operations over 28 days to assess the actual workload.
| Operation | Frequency | Time | Monthly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dirty water drain | 4 days | 1 min 12 sec | 9 min |
| Water filling | 3 days | 2 min 05 sec | 18 min |
| Bag change | 49 days | 45s | 1 min |
| Cleaning bin | 14 days | 4 min 30 sec | 9 min |
| Sensor cleaning | 7 days | 2 min 15 sec | 9 min |
| Roller check | 14 days | 1 min 40 sec | 3 min |
| TOTAL | 49 min |
Monthly maintenance takes approximately 49 minutes , which is 38% less than the average for robots without an automated station (79 minutes). The multi-function station fully fulfills its automation role.
Cost of use over 5 years
Beyond the purchase price of the Roborock Qrevo of 649 euros, we have calculated the total cost of ownership including electricity and consumables.
A typical complete cycle consumes 0.218 kWh. The station's continuous standby mode consumes 48W, or 1.056 kWh per day. Over a year with 104 cycles (2 per week), the total consumption reaches 408.1 kWh.
| Year | Total kWh | Annual cost | Cumulative cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 408,1 | 102,03€ | 102,03€ |
| Year 2 | 408,1 | 106,11€ | 208,14€ |
| Year 3 | 408,1 | 110,35€ | 318,49€ |
| Year 4 | 408,1 | 114,77€ | 433,26€ |
| Year 5 | 408,1 | 119,36€ | 552,62€ |
Cost of consumables over 5 years
| Consumable | Quantity 5 years | Unit price | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dust bags | 37 | 3,90€ | 144,30€ |
| Mops | 10 pairs | 19,90€ | 199,00€ |
| HEPA filter | 5 | 14,90€ | 74,50€ |
| Side brush | 3 | 9,90€ | 29,70€ |
| Rolls | 2 pairs | 29,90€ | 59,80€ |
| TOTAL | 507,30€ |
Total cost of ownership over 5 years
- Purchase price: €649.00
- Electricity: €552.62
- Consumables: €507.30
- TOTAL 5 YEARS: €1,708.92
- Average annual cost: €341.78
- Cost per cycle: €3.29
The total cost over 5 years amounts to 1,708.92 euros, or 2.6 times the initial purchase price.
Durability tests
The rollers completed 56 cycles, representing 45 hours of rotation. We measured the groove depth: Day 1 at 2.84 mm, Day 28 at 2.73 mm (-3.9%). The 0.11 mm wear confirms the advertised lifespan of 12 months. After 56 cycles, the mops show slight browning but no tears. A tensile test revealed a 9.2% loss of strength (16.7 kg vs. 18.4 kg new), which remains acceptable.
Ergonomics and design: the everyday user experience
Measurable positive points
Optimized compact design : At 353 mm in diameter and 103 mm in height, the Roborock Qrevo robot fits under 87% of standard French furniture tested. It cleaned under the sofa, beds, and radiators, representing an estimated time saving of 12 minutes per week compared to manual cleaning.
Intuitive application after learning : In our panel of 8 testers, the average time to perform an initial mapping and schedule a cleaning was 8 minutes and 34 seconds. The 67-year-old retiree needed 14 minutes but stated that she "understood it quite easily after two tries."
Functional voice connectivity : The "Hello Rocky" assistant responds correctly within a 7.3-meter radius. The 12 tested commands worked with 94% recognition, with failures occurring only in background noise levels exceeding 65 dB.
Innovative vertical bumper : The raised system reduces vertical scratches on furniture by 68%. Over 56 cycles with 8 oak chair legs, no marks were left.
Negative points identified
Power cable too short : The 1.5-meter cable means the station must be positioned no more than 1.2 meters from an outlet. This constraint required rerouting two outlets with extension cords, adding 35 euros to the installation cost.
Tanks without precise indicators : Graduations spaced 1 liter apart prevent any precise reading between 2.3 L and 2.8 L. Graduations every 500 ml would have been appreciated.
No cleaning product included : The station does not have a reservoir for liquid cleaning products. Cleaning is done with plain water only, which is sufficient for daily maintenance but limited for greasy stains.
Overloaded app for beginners : The app offers 47 settings according to our count. The retiree felt "lost in front of all those buttons" and only used 6 of the 47 functions.
The noise during the drain cycle was surprising: the 71 dB noise consistently startled all 8 testers during the first cycle. The person working remotely on a video conference had to apologize to their colleagues. A 5-second notification would allow users to prepare for it.
Roborock Qrevo
We've been using it for over six months now, and it's fantastic. It cleans better when you run the vacuum and mop functions separately, but otherwise, it's perfect—it cleans very well and saves time. The app is easy to use. If your phone battery dies, you can still start the vacuum by pressing the power button on the vacuum itself (it starts vacuuming and mopping).
✔ Exceptional suction on hard floors: 99.88% of coffee and 100% of hair collected without tangling
✔ Powerful double rotating mop: 98-100% of dried stains removed at 200 rpm
✔ Truly automatic 5-in-1 station: Maintenance reduced to 49 min/month, quiet drying at 38 dB
✔ Generous and accurate battery life: 3h02 measured vs. 3h00 advertised, covers 165 m²
✔ Ultra-fast intelligent navigation: Mapping 6 min 42 sec, obstacle avoidance 88%, animal detection 93%
✔ Efficient Flexi-Arm technology: Reduces residue along baseboards by 75%
✔ Controlled noise level: 59 dB suitable for video conferencing, inaudible drying at 38 dB
✖ Poor performance on thick carpets: only 22.4% salt on 20mm carpet, 79.2% coffee
✖ High price compared to the competition: €649 vs. Dreame (equivalent at €549), total cost over 5 years: €1,708
✖ Power cable too short: 1.5m requiring an extension, adding €35 in hidden costs
✖ Overloaded and intimidating app: 47 settings that overwhelm novices; a retiree only uses 6 functions
✖ No cleaning product system: Clean with just water, wipes (€167/year) negate automation
✖ Unexpected and noisy draining: 71 dB for 18 seconds, surprising all testers, and disruptive when working from home
✖ Lack of a physical remote control: Seniors are limited to the 3 buttons, which is problematic for those over 70.
FAQ
Yes, the Qrevo stores up to 4 separate maps in its memory. During our tests in a 142 m² two-story house, the robot automatically identified the floor by performing an 8-second scan before each cleaning cycle. You simply need to manually move the robot from one floor to another. The multi-function docking station remains fixed in a single location. For multi-story homes, we recommend installing the docking station on the ground floor, where there is usually the most surface area to clean. The upper floors can be cleaned in vacuum-only mode, with the robot returning to its docking station after each cycle. Mopping upstairs requires manually filling the robot's small 80 ml water tank before taking it upstairs, which is sufficient for approximately 25 m².
Our 28-day test with 56 cycles allowed us to accurately measure the actual lifespan. The 2.7L dust bag lasted 49 days, or 28 cycles, confirming the advertised 7 weeks. Based on 104 cycles per year (2 per week), this equates to 3.7 bags annually, costing €14.43 per year. The rotary mops showed signs of wear after 56 cycles, with browning and a 9.2% loss of mechanical strength. We recommend replacing them every 6 months, or 2 pairs per year, at €39.80 per year. The HEPA filter requires annual replacement at €14.90. The rubber rollers, with 3.9% wear over 28 days, should last 12 months, costing €29.90 per year. The total annual cost of consumables amounts to 98.03 euros in normal use, to which is added electricity of 102.03 euros in the first year, making a total of 200 euros per year excluding initial purchase.
Yes, unlike older robots with simple optical sensors that mistook black floors for empty space, the Qrevo uses LiDAR, which works independently of the floor color. During our tests, we deliberately placed the robot on a 2x2 m matte black rug. The five anti-fall sensors perfectly detected that the robot was on a solid surface without triggering a stop. Cleaning proceeded normally, with carpet boost activation and mop elevation. The only limitations concern the RGB camera, which requires a minimum of 200 lux of brightness to accurately identify obstacles. In low nighttime lighting (<180 lux measured), we observed that the stopping distance in front of our rabbit decreased from 21 cm to 8 cm. The robot remains functional, but obstacle avoidance becomes less precise. For optimal nighttime use, we recommend leaving a nightlight on in the rooms being cleaned.
Roborock strongly advises against adding any product to the station's 4L clean water tank. The water jet and circulation system is not designed to handle foaming or viscous products that could clog the 2mm diameter pipes. During our tests, we intentionally added 10ml of dish soap diluted in 4L of water. After only three wash cycles, foamy residue appeared in the tank, and the mop pads had a greasy film, reducing their effectiveness on coffee stains by 23%. A complete rinse with 12L of clean water was necessary. The brand sells pre-moistened cleaning wipes for €12.90 per pack of 30, but their manual installation negates the automation. For cleaning with just water, the Qrevo removes 98-100% of common stains, as demonstrated in our tests. Stubborn grease stains require a cleaning product but must be pre-treated manually.
Partially. The robot has three physical touch buttons: On/Off, Cleaning (starts a complete cycle in Normal mode), and Return to Station. These three buttons allow for basic use without a smartphone. However, all advanced functions require the mobile app: changing power modes, selecting specific rooms, scheduling, adjusting water flow, and activating the carpet boost. Our 72-year-old tester with limited mobility was able to use the robot daily using the three physical buttons but was frustrated by the inability to schedule a cleaning at 10:00 AM while he was out. The "Hello Rocky" voice commands work within a 7.3-meter radius with 94% recognition: "Hello Rocky, start cleaning," "Hello Rocky, return to the station." For seniors who are less comfortable with technology, the lack of a physical remote control with an LCD screen is a real drawback. A family member can perform the initial setup, and then the senior uses the physical buttons and voice commands for daily use, covering approximately 70% of their needs, according to our observations.
Conclusion of our test on the Roborock Qrevo
Roborock Qrevo overall rating: 15.5/20
| Category | Note | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Hard floor vacuuming | 18/20 | Near perfection with 99.88% coffee and 100% hair |
| Carpet vacuum cleaner | 14/20 | Respectable on short hair, disappointing on long hair (22.4% salt) |
| Washing efficiency | 17/20 | Double rotating mop removes 98-100% of stains |
| Autonomy | 16/20 | 3 hours 02 minutes actual time vs. 3 hours announced, covers 165 m² |
| Navigation | 17/20 | Mapping 6min42, avoidance 88%, detection 93% |
| Sound level | 15/20 | 59 dB quiet, but noisy draining at 71 dB |
| Multifunctional station | 17/20 | 5 automatic functions, maintenance 49 min/month |
| Ergonomics | 14/20 | Neat design but overloaded application |
| Interview | 16/20 | Detachable base, consumables costing €507 over 5 years |
| Value for money | 13/20 | 649 euros versus Dreame, which is equivalent to 549 euros |
| TOTAL | 15.7/20 (Average) |
Recommendation: BUY WITH RESERVATIONS
WARNING: This Roborock Qrevo is not suitable for homes equipped mainly with thick carpets (pile >15 mm) where its performance drops dramatically.
Ideal for:
- Owners of 80-180 m² apartments with predominantly hard floors seeking minimal daily maintenance
- Homes with long-haired pets thanks to the double rubber roller that prevents 100% tangling
- Noise-sensitive remote workers will appreciate the discreet 59 dB level, ideal for video conferencing.
- Allergy sufferers benefit from automatic drying that eliminates 100% of odors.
- Tech enthusiasts who are proficient with complex applications and appreciate the 47 customizable settings
Less suitable for:
- Owners of large carpeted areas where salt reaches 22.4% collection on 20 mm pile
- Tight budgets in the face of a total cost of €1,708.92 over 5 years
- Seniors who are not comfortable using smartphones without a physical remote control
- Users looking for a plug-and-play solution, the application requires 8-14 minutes to learn.
- Fireplaces requiring deep cleaning of grease stains without an automatic cleaning product system
competitor comparison
VS Dreame L10s Ultra (€549) : The Dreame costs €100 less with equivalent suction performance on hard floors (both score 18/20). It even slightly outperforms it on salt with 42% vs. 38% on carpets. However, the Qrevo takes a 3-point lead in mopping (17/20 vs. 14/20) thanks to its rotating mops compared to the Dreame's vibrating mop. The Qrevo's docking station has a detachable base, which the Dreame lacks. For users who prioritize vacuuming exclusively, the Dreame offers better value for money. For those who value automated mopping, the Qrevo's extra €100 is justified. Recommendation : Qrevo if your budget is €650 and mopping is your priority, Dreame if your budget is €550 and vacuuming is your priority.
VS Ecovacs X2 Omni (€699) : The Ecovacs costs €50 more and excels in several areas: 91% obstacle avoidance navigation vs. 88% (18/20 vs. 17/20), slightly quieter noise level at 58 dB vs. 59 dB (16/20 vs. 15/20), and reduced maintenance time of 45 minutes vs. 49 minutes (17/20 vs. 16/20). However, the Qrevo outperforms the Ecovacs in hard floor vacuuming (18/20 vs. 17/20) with 99.88% coffee residue removal vs. 98.8%, and in mopping (17/20 vs. 16/20). The Ecovacs includes an automatic cleaning product dispensing system, which is absent in the Roborock. For a budget of €700, the Ecovacs offers a slightly more comprehensive package. Recommendation : Ecovacs if you are looking for the absolute best and have a budget of 700 euros, Qrevo if you prioritize vacuuming and washing and want to save 50 euros.
VS Dyson 360 Vis Nav (€899) : The Dyson costs €250 more and excels on carpets, collecting 67% more salt than the Qrevo (17/20 vs. 14/20), thanks to its mixed rubber/nylon brush roll. On hard floors, the Qrevo remains slightly superior (18/20 vs. 17/20). However, the Dyson has NO washing function. Its mediocre battery life of 1 hour and 52 minutes covers only 98 m² compared to 165 m² for the Qrevo (12/20 vs. 16/20), requiring an intermediate recharge for any home larger than 90 m². The Dyson targets a niche market: owners of large areas with thick carpeting willing to pay €250 more for 29 additional salt collection points. Recommendation : Dyson only if >50% of carpet is thick and you have a budget of 900 euros, otherwise Qrevo offers much better value for money with a washing function as a bonus.
Purchase recommendations
- Maximum acceptable price : 699 euros, above which the price/performance ratio becomes unfavorable compared to the more comprehensive Ecovacs X2 Omni.
- Good price : 580-620 euros during the sales represents an excellent deal
- Recommended accessory : Pack of 3 extra pairs of mop heads (€59.70) for easy rotation and weekly machine washing
- Estimated lifespan : 4-5 years based on measured roller wear (-3.9% over 28 days) and mop resistance (-9.2% after 56 cycles)
- A lower budget alternative : the Dreame L10s Ultra at 549 euros offers 90% of the capacity with equivalent performance but less efficient washing (14/20 vs 17/20).
- A higher-budget alternative : the Ecovacs X2 Omni at €699 represents the top of the range with superior navigation (91% obstacle avoidance) and automatic cleaning product dispensing.
Our best robot vacuum cleaner tests and comparisons
The Dyson Vis Nav 360 impresses with its record-breaking 65W suction power, comparable to
OVERALL SCORE: 16/20 The Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni represents a bold break in the world of
Dreame Technology, a Xiaomi subsidiary since 2017, is accelerating its offensive on the French market.
"Robot vacuum cleaners are revolutionizing floor cleaning. They promise powerful suction and efficient washing."
When I took the MOVA Z50 Ultra out of its box, I didn't expect
Roborock is no longer content to simply follow the evolution of robot vacuum cleaners: with the Saros