Maintaining the water in a salt or chlorine pool is essential and goes far beyond simple aesthetics. Properly treated water not only ensures pleasant visual clarity, but also, more importantly, the health and safety of swimmers, while extending the life of pool equipment and coatings. Effective treatment prevents the growth of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and algae, and protects pool surfaces from damage.
When it comes to disinfecting private pools, two main methods dominate the market and are widely adopted: traditional chlorine pool treatment and salt chlorination. While both approaches aim to maintain healthy water, they operate according to distinct philosophies and offer different user experiences. Chlorine is a proven chemical disinfectant, while salt, a naturally occurring mineral, is used to generate chlorine on-site.
This comprehensive report aims to provide a detailed comparison between these two popular pool treatment methods. It will explore their fundamental mechanisms, analyze their respective advantages and disadvantages, assess the associated costs (initial investment and ongoing operational expenses), detail maintenance requirements, examine their impact on various pool components, assess swimming comfort, and discuss their overall reliability. In addition, special attention will be paid to essential equipment and reputable brands to help make an informed decision, perfectly aligned with specific needs, budget, and lifestyle.
CCEI Salt Treatment – Zelia ZLT 50
✅ Highlights
- Compact and ergonomic design, ideal for cramped technical rooms.
- “Fun” cell that lights up to indicate the salt level or water temperature.
- Automatic polarity reversal system for constant cell cleaning.
- Simplified installation with integrated flow and temperature sensors.
- Chlorine production that automatically adapts to water temperature and pool cover.
❌ Weak points
- Sometimes it is necessary to oversize the device to ensure sufficient production.
- The cost of a new cell, to be replaced after a few years, can be high.
- The interface, although simple, may require a little patience to master all the features.
- Risk of scaling and corrosion if water quality is not rigorously managed.
💬 Reviews & Ratings
- ⭐ 4.1/5: The CCEI Zelia ZLT 50 is a good electrolyser for those looking for a simple and automated water treatment solution. Its smart design and practical features make everyday life easier, although, like any device of this type, you should anticipate the cost of replacing the cell and size your purchase carefully.
Zodiac GenSalt OT 25
✅ Highlights
- Ease of use (intuitive box, just one button).
- Self-cleaning cell by polarity inversion (less maintenance).
- Stable chlorine production for swimming pools up to 110 m³.
- Compact format, easy integration into technical rooms.
- Superior bathing comfort, without the classic chlorine odor.
❌ Weak points
- Higher initial investment than conventional chlorination.
- Electrolysis cell expensive to replace after several years.
- Risk of corrosion of metal parts if the salt level is poorly managed.
💬 Reviews & Ratings
- ⭐ 4,3/5 — High-performance and simple solution for automating disinfection. Excellent ease of use; beware of the acquisition cost and long-term cell replacement.
Table of Contents
Understanding Chlorine Pools: The Traditional Approach
This section explores the long-standard chlorine disinfection method, detailing its operational aspects, benefits, drawbacks, and maintenance considerations.
Chlorine disinfection mechanism
Chlorine, in its various forms, acts as a powerful disinfectant by reacting with water (H₂O) to form hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hydrochloric acid (HCl). HOCl is the primary active agent responsible for disinfection, effectively destroying a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, spores, and algae. This process also involves the oxidation of organic matter introduced by swimmers (such as sweat and sunscreen) and environmental debris such as leaves.
It is important to note that chlorine is highly reactive and oxidizes various inorganic or organic substances present in the water. It reacts in particular with nitrogenous materials, which represent approximately 60% of nitrogen pollution introduced by swimmers, such as urea. This urea is converted into ammonia at the filters, and then the ammonia reacts with free chlorine to form mono- and dichloramines (DCA) and trichloramine (TCA). These chloramines have adverse health effects, and their formation should be avoided. The presence of these compounds is often the cause of the characteristic “chlorine” odor in swimming pools, signaling suboptimal water quality and not effective disinfection. This implies that managing a chlorine pool must go beyond simply maintaining disinfectant levels, requiring proactive measures to minimize chloramine formation and ensure good ventilation, which can represent an operational challenge and an implicit cost.
Available forms of chlorine
Chlorine is available in several forms to suit different application needs:
Slow-release chlorine: Typically available in the form of tablets or pellets (often stabilized with cyanuric acid), it is designed for gradual release over 5 to 7 days, ensuring continuous disinfection. It is crucial to avoid direct contact of the chlorine tablets with the pool liner, as this can cause irreversible damage and discoloration. The use of a floating dispenser or automatic chlorinator is recommended for controlled distribution.
Rapid or shock chlorine: Available in granules or tablets (often stabilized), it is used for a rapid increase in the chlorine level, particularly effective for treating green or cloudy water, or after heavy use of the pool.
Liquid chlorine: Unstabilized, it is mainly used with automatic dosing pumps for precise and continuous injection into the water.
Multi-function chlorine: These tablets incorporate additional agents such as flocculants (to clarify the water) and anti-algae, providing a complete treatment in a single product.
Using stabilized chlorine is a double-edged sword. The stabilizer protects the chlorine from UV rays, extending its lifespan. However, excess stabilizer (above 75 mg/L) significantly reduces the chlorine's effectiveness. When chlorine becomes ineffective due to over-stabilization, owners may be tempted to add more chlorine, creating a vicious cycle of increased chemical consumption without achieving adequate disinfection. The only solution to over-stabilization is partial dilution or water renewal. This creates a hidden operational cost and environmental impact (water waste) for chlorine-based pools. The perceived ease of using stabilized chlorine can thus lead to long-term problems and increased expenses if stabilizer levels are not rigorously monitored.
Benefits of Chlorine Pools
Formidable effectiveness: Chlorine is a disinfectant of undeniable power against a wide range of microorganisms (fungi, algae, bacteria, viruses) and effectively oxidizes organic matter, guaranteeing clear and healthy pool water.
Lower initial cost: Compared to salt systems, installing a chlorine treatment system generally represents a lower initial investment. The annual cost of chlorine products is also relatively moderate, ranging between €50 and €150 per year.
Wide Availability: Chlorine products are readily available in various forms in most pool specialty stores and even large supermarkets.
Disadvantages of Chlorine Pools
Odor and irritation: Chlorine often produces a pungent, persistent odor (due to chloramines, not chlorine itself) that can be unpleasant and irritating to the respiratory system, especially for sensitive individuals and young children. It can also cause skin, eye, and mucous membrane irritation, making rinsing with clean water advisable after swimming.
Chemical nature: Chlorine is a synthetic chemical, making it a less environmentally friendly choice compared to salt treatment, which uses a natural mineral.
Impact on fabrics and coating: Chlorine tends to discolor swimsuits, towels, and pool liners over time. Direct contact between chlorine tablets and the coating can cause rapid and irreversible damage, such as bleaching or weakening of the material.
Reduced effectiveness at high temperatures: The effectiveness of chlorine as a disinfectant decreases as water temperature increases, requiring increased doses during warm periods to maintain water clarity.
The perceived “economical” initial cost of chlorine is often misleading. Actual long-term operational costs can be significantly higher due to several factors. Higher temperatures require more chlorine, increasing product consumption. Stabilizer buildup forces dilutions or partial water changes, resulting in water and time costs. Most importantly, direct contact with chlorine tablets or unbalanced water chemistry can cause irreversible and costly damage to liners, gelcoat, and metal equipment. This means owners must consider the total cost of ownership, including potential repair and replacement expenses, when evaluating chlorine. The “economical” label primarily applies to the initial purchase of the chemical, not necessarily the overall financial impact over the life of the pool.
Chlorine Pool Maintenance Requirements
Regular water parameter testing: Maintaining an accurate chemical balance is essential. Key parameters to monitor include:
pH: The most critical indicator, ideally between 7.0 and 7.4 (or 7.2 and 7.6). Too high a pH significantly reduces the effectiveness of chlorine.
Total Alkalinity (TAC): Acts as a “buffer” for pH, ideally between 10 and 30°F. A stable TAC is crucial for a stable pH.
Total Hardness (TH): Indicates the softness or hardness of the water. Too low a TH can make the water corrosive and irritating.
Free Chlorine Level: Must be maintained between 1.0 and 3.0 ppm (mg/L) for effective disinfection.
Stabilizer level (Cyanuric Acid): Ideally between 20 and 30 mg/L; exceeding 75 mg/L seriously impairs the effectiveness of the chlorine.
Frequency of checks: Temperature (1 to 2 times per month), TAC (monthly or when adjusting the water level), pH (daily to weekly depending on use), and chlorine (weekly).
Chlorine Dosage and Application: The typical dosage is one 200g tablet per 30m³ of water per week, adjusted according to water quality and usage. It is imperative to avoid placing chlorine tablets directly in the skimmer or on the pool liner, as this can cause localized damage and discoloration. It is preferable to use a floating diffuser or an automatic chlorinator for controlled diffusion.
Shock treatment: Essential for quickly increasing chlorine levels to combat green water, algae blooms, or after heavy use. This involves the use of fast-dissolving granules or tablets.
Algaecides: Chlorine alone may not be enough to prevent algae growth, especially in hot, sunny weather. Weekly addition of an algaecide is recommended as a preventative measure. Special care is required with copper-based algaecides, which can contribute to rust stains.
Flocculation: For sand filters, flocculants help clump tiny suspended particles into larger clumps, making them easier to retain in the filter, improving water clarity and reducing disinfectant consumption.
The burden of manual maintenance creates a direct link between the owner's diligence and the effectiveness or longevity of the system. Improper maintenance, due to a lack of time or knowledge, can quickly lead to water quality issues (green, cloudy water) and costly damage to the pool infrastructure. This means that chlorine is not a "set it and forget it" solution and requires constant commitment from the owner. For users who prioritize convenience, the perceived economic benefit could be quickly eroded by the demands of constant manual maintenance.
Impact of chlorine on pool components
Liner and Gel Coat: Direct contact with chlorine tablets or persistently unbalanced water chemistry (especially low pH combined with high chlorine) can cause irreversible damage to pool liners and gelcoat surfaces. This includes discoloration, bleaching, premature wear, and even the formation of microcracks that can compromise structural integrity and lead to leaks.
Metal Equipment: Acidic water (low pH) or excessively high chlorine concentrations can cause corrosion of metal components in the pool system, including ladders, handrails, and internal copper plumbing in the hydraulic system.
The chemical aggression of chlorine, especially when mismanaged or when water parameters are unbalanced, poses a significant risk to the structural integrity and aesthetic longevity of the pool itself. This goes beyond simple water quality to affect the primary investment.
Equipment associated with chlorine pools
Filtration systems: Chlorine treatment is compatible with all common types of filter media. The most popular remains the sand filter , compatible with all pumps and equipment. Alternatives such as
Zeolite offers finer filtration and requires less quantity than sand.
Glass filter media (recycled or new) is an eco-responsible option, offering very high filtration fineness, preventing bacterial growth, and lasting up to twice as long as sand.
Cartridge filters offer the finest filtration (down to 10 microns, compared to 20-40 for sand), save water by not requiring backwashing, and have a smaller footprint. They are considered ideal for eco-friendly pools.
Dosing Pumps: For liquid chlorine, automatic dosing pumps (such as those from So'Tech or Dosatron) are available to monitor and regulate chlorine levels in real time, automating the treatment process. For example, a So'Tech pump can handle pools up to 160 m³ with a power consumption of 35 Watts. Dosatron pumps offer adjustable dosing and various flow rates.
The availability of automatic dosing pumps and advanced filtration media suggests a trend toward technology-enhanced chlorine's drawbacks. A chlorine pool can thus transition from a highly manual system to a more convenient, semi-automated system, blurring the lines with salt systems in terms of automation. This means owners can tailor their chlorine system to their desired level of commitment, with an additional initial investment in automation equipment.
Chlorine Pool Maintenance Parameters
| Setting | Ideal Beach | Frequency of Verification | Impact of Imbalance |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.0 – 7.4 (or 7.2 – 7.6) | Daily to weekly | High pH reduces the effectiveness of chlorine, low pH causes corrosion and irritation |
| Total Alkalinity (TAC) | 10 – 30°F | Monthly or at water level adjustment | Unstable TAC causes pH fluctuations |
| Total Hardness (TH) | Not specified, but low TH (<10°F) is "mild" | Not specified, but impacts pH and corrosivity | Low TH can make water corrosive and irritating |
| Free Chlorine | 1.0 – 3.0 ppm (mg/L) | Weekly | Low levels result in poor disinfection, high levels irritate |
| Stabilizer (Cyanuric Acid) | 20 – 30 mg/L | Not specified, but worth watching | Above 75 mg/L, greatly reduces the effectiveness of chlorine |
Understanding Salt Water Pools: The Modern Alternative
This section explores the operation, advantages and disadvantages of salt water pools, a disinfection method increasingly favored for its comfort and ease of maintenance.
Mechanism of salt electrolysis
Salt water pools, despite their name, still use chlorine for disinfection. The fundamental difference is that the chlorine is generated directly on-site, in the pool's filtration system, through a process called electrolysis.
This process begins by dissolving non-iodized salt (usually at a low concentration of 3 to 5 grams per liter, much less salty than seawater) directly into the pool water. An electrolyzer, a specialized device installed in the pool's filtration system, then uses a low-voltage electric current to convert the chloride ions (Cl⁻) present in the salt into active chlorine (sodium hypochlorite, HOCl). The chemical reaction involves the conversion of chloride ions into chlorine gas (2 Cl⁻ → Cl₂), which immediately dissolves in the water to form hypochlorous acid (Cl₂ + H₂O → HOCl + HCl). This hypochlorous acid is the powerful disinfectant that purifies the water.
It's crucial to understand that even in a saltwater pool, disinfection is provided by chlorine. The major distinction lies in the method of production of this chlorine: it is generated naturally on site and without the addition of stabilizers. This clarifies that the choice is not to avoid chlorine, but rather to opt for a gentler, more automated method of producing disinfectant that is less dependent on packaged chemicals.
The Regenerative Cycle: A Closed Loop System
A significant advantage of salt chlorination is its regenerative nature. After the active chlorine disinfects the water by neutralizing contaminants, it naturally recombines into salt, primarily under the influence of the sun's UV rays. This creates a continuous, regenerative, closed-loop cycle within the pool.
As a result, the salt itself is consumed very slowly. Replenishment is generally only necessary in cases of significant water loss due to partial draining, severe dilution (e.g., from heavy rainfall), or repeated filter backwashing. Thus, the initial addition of salt is often sufficient for several seasons. This regenerative cycle is central to the ecological benefits and low maintenance of salt pools, as it minimizes the need to continually add chemicals and reduces chemical waste.
Benefits of Salt Water Pools
Superior swimming comfort: Saltwater pools offer a significantly more pleasant swimming experience. There is no pungent chlorine odor (due to chloramines), significantly reduced irritation to the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes, and no metallic taste in the water. This makes them particularly ideal for young children, people with sensitive skin, or those prone to respiratory problems.
Reduced Maintenance: Once the salt concentration is established and the chlorinator is programmed, the system largely automates the disinfection process. This continuous, on-demand chlorine production significantly reduces the need for frequent manual handling and chemical addition. The initial salt is typically sufficient for 3 seasons.
Eco-friendly approach: Salt is a natural and biodegradable mineral, making the system more environmentally friendly than traditional chlorine treatment, as it avoids the use of harsh chemicals, their packaging and associated waste.
The comfort and low maintenance of salt water pools are directly related to the absence of stabilizer in the chlorine generated and its fresh production on site. This avoids the accumulation of chloramines (responsible for odor and irritation) and the over-stabilization problems common with traditional chlorine.
Disadvantages of salt pools
Higher initial investment: The main disadvantage of a salt pool is the significant initial cost associated with purchasing and installing the chlorinator. These devices can cost between €800 and €2,000, and professional installation is often required, increasing the initial budget. Converting an existing chlorine pool to a salt system can cost between €1,000 and €2,500.
Corrosion potential: Salt water is more electrically conductive than fresh water, which can accelerate galvanic corrosion on incompatible metal pool components (e.g., standard stainless steel, untreated metal parts, some PVC roller shutters). This requires careful material selection and proper electrical grounding during pool construction or conversion.
Cell fragility and lifespan: The electrolysis cell, which contains the electrodes, is a component subject to wear. It is prone to scaling (calcium buildup) and has a limited lifespan, generally 4 to 7 years on average. The cost of replacing a cell can vary from €200 to €500. Neglected maintenance significantly reduces this lifespan.
Need for pH regulation: The electrolysis process naturally tends to increase the pH of the pool water (due to the formation of soda). This requires regular monitoring and often the use of an automatic pH regulator to maintain optimal levels (7.2-7.4) to ensure effective disinfection and bather comfort.
Temperature limitations: The efficiency of salt chlorination decreases significantly in cold water. Below approximately 15°C, the chlorinator may slow down or cease to function properly, requiring alternative treatment methods or specific winterizing procedures.
The higher initial cost of salt systems is a long-term investment that is offset by lower annual product costs and significantly less maintenance effort. However, this long-term benefit depends on proper installation (particularly with regard to corrosion prevention) and diligent maintenance of the electrolyzer cell. The risk of corrosion is a critical, often underestimated factor that can lead to very costly repairs if not considered during planning and installation.
Salt Water Pool Maintenance Requirements
Salt level: Although salt is consumed slowly, its concentration in the water must be maintained within the optimal range (usually 3-5 g/L, depending on the chlorinator model). Regular checking with a reliable tester is essential, and salt should be added directly to the main pool (never to the skimmer) to ensure proper dissolution.
Cell Cleaning (Descaling): Limescale and other mineral deposits can build up on the cell electrodes, reducing its efficiency and chlorine production. Cleaning frequency varies depending on water hardness (from weekly in very hard areas to biannually in softer areas) and visual inspection. Although many modern chlorinators have self-cleaning functions (by polarity reversal), periodic manual cleaning with diluted vinegar or hydrochloric acid (with extreme caution) is still necessary, generally every 6 months.
pH Monitoring and Regulation: Due to the natural tendency of electrolysis to increase pH, constant monitoring (at least weekly during peak season) is crucial. Investing in an automatic pH regulator is highly recommended to maintain the ideal pH range (7.2-7.4) and ensure optimal chlorine efficiency and bather comfort.
Winterizing Procedures: When water temperatures drop below 15-16°C, it is advisable to turn off the chlorinator to prevent possible damage to the electrodes due to oxygen production. The cell should be removed from the filtration circuit, emptied of water, and stored in a frost-free, dust-free location during the off-season.
Although salt systems are “automated,” they are not “maintenance-free.” The critical need to clean the cell and regulate pH means that a commitment from the user, while different from that required for chlorine, is still required. Neglecting these tasks has a direct impact on the efficiency and lifespan of the system, leading to premature replacement costs. The perception of “no maintenance” for salt pools is misleading; they offer automation for the
disinfectant production , but still require active monitoring and specific maintenance tasks, particularly for the cell and pH.
Impact of salt on pool components
Corrosion Risk: The increased conductivity of salt water significantly increases the risk of galvanic corrosion on incompatible metal components. This includes standard stainless steel ladders, handrails, and even internal hydraulic components if they are not made from suitable materials (e.g., specific grades of stainless steel or plastic).
Coatings and Surfaces: Although less irritating to liners than direct contact with chlorine, the corrosive potential of salt water on metal components can indirectly affect the coating if the structural elements are compromised. To protect against electrolytic corrosion, which can even penetrate polyester liners or shells, it is imperative that the pool water be grounded.
The risk of corrosion in saltwater pools is not just an aesthetic issue, but a potential structural and safety concern. The concept of "pool-earth" (grounding the pool water) and sacrificial anodes are advanced considerations that highlight the need for expert installation and careful material selection to truly mitigate this risk.
Equipment associated with salt pools
Chlorinators: These are the central component of a salt system. Models vary depending on pool volume capacity, salt concentration requirements, and features:
Innowater SMC: Compact, high performance, waterproof power source, LCD display, programmable polarity reversal, easy cell access.
Zodiac Gensalt OT 25: High-end device, for pools up to 110 m³, durable titanium cell (more than 10,000 hours), easy Quick Fix installation, controls water quality, pH and filtration pump, shock chlorination functions and shutter mode.
CCEI Zelia ZLT 50: Offers the best price/performance compromise, for small pools up to 50 m³, compact, easy to install (vertically/horizontally), low salt requirement (approximately 3 g/L), 8 disinfectant production modes, automatic shutdown in case of lack of salt, the cell changes color according to the temperature/salt concentration.
Bayrol Salt Relax: For 70 m³ pools, 3.3 g/L of salt, pH control, integrated temperature sensor, self-cleaning cell.
Perle Salt+: Highly rated, for 70 m³ pools, very low salt requirement (1 g/L), automatic chlorine regulator, very robust housing with palladium plates, self-cleaning cell. Does not have a shock treatment mode.
Gre SCG100: For large pools up to 100 m³, 4 g/L of salt, high chlorine productivity, shock chlorine mode.
pH Regulators: Given the tendency of salt chlorination to raise pH, an automatic pH regulator (often a separate dosing pump) is highly recommended, if not essential, to maintain optimal water balance and ensure the efficiency of the chlorinator. Prices for automatic pH regulators range from €219 to over €800 for integrated systems.
Innowater pH-Wireless: Independent dosing pump with wireless control, allowing remote installation to protect equipment from acid.
Innowater pH-Redox: Stand-alone regulator with integrated dosing pump, controlling pH and redox potential.
Filtration Systems: Salt systems are compatible with all types of pool filters. However, it is recommended to pair them with energy-efficient variable-speed pumps (e.g., Pentair or Hayward) to minimize electricity consumption, as the filtration pump remains the main energy consumer in a pool.
The wide range of chlorinator models and their specific features (volume capacity, salt requirement, integrated pH control, self-cleaning, shock mode) means that choosing a chlorinator is a nuanced decision that must match the size of the pool, the owner's budget, and the desired level of automation. The integration of pH regulation is a key feature that further enhances automation and comfort, justifying higher costs.
Table 2: Comparison of salt electrolyser models
| Model | Max. Volume (m³) | Required Salt (g/L) | Key Features | Indicative Price | Guarantee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodiac Gensalt OT 25 | 110 | Not specified | High-end, Titanium Cell >10000h, Quick Fix, pH/Filtration Control, Shock Chlorination, Shutter Mode | Not specified | 3 years (case/cell) |
Comparison of chlorine and salt pools
This table provides a concise and visually effective summary of the key differences between salt and chlorine treatment systems. It allows for a quick assessment of critical decision factors, helping to identify the system that best fits individual priorities.
| Characteristic | Chlorine swimming pool | Salt Pool |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Cost | Weak | High (requires electrolyzer) |
| Annual Cost of Products | 50 – 150 €/year | 30 – 100 €/year (salt consumed slowly) |
| Maintenance Effort | Frequent and manual | Reduced and semi-automated |
| Bathing Comfort | Odor/Irritation (eyes, skin) | Odorless/Skin-friendly |
| Environmental Impact | Chemical (stabilizer) | Natural mineral, biodegradable |
| Equipment Sustainability | Liner/fabric discoloration, corrosion if pH is low | Cell wear, corrosion if incompatible materials |
| Common Problems | Unstable pH, over-stabilization, green water | High pH, cell scaling, corrosion |
| Disinfectant Production | Adding external products | On-site generation by electrolysis |
Detailed cost analysis
Initial installation cost: Chlorine is more economical to install, requiring mainly only the purchase of chemicals and basic dosing equipment. In contrast, salt requires a higher initial investment due to the required electrolyzer (€800 to €2,000) and potentially a pH regulator, often with professional installation.
Annual product costs: Chlorine products cost between €50 and €150 per year. For salt, the annual cost is €30 to €100, with the salt initially added over several seasons. However, you should anticipate the cost of replacing the electrolyser cell every 4 to 7 years (€200 to €500).
Power consumption of associated equipment:
Electrolyzer: The electricity consumption of an electrolyzer is very low, estimated at between 150 and 200 kWh per year for a 100 m³ pool, which represents approximately €35 per year (at the regulated rate in June 2025). It is much less energy-intensive than the filtration pump.
Dosing Pumps (Chlorine): A chlorine dosing pump, like the one from So'Tech, consumes 35 watts. While minimal individually, this adds to the pool's overall electricity bill.
Filtration pump: This is the main electricity consumption item in a swimming pool, regardless of the type of treatment. Variable-speed pumps are highly recommended for their energy efficiency.
Although salt systems have a higher initial cost, their lower annual product costs and the chlorinator's minimal power consumption contribute to a potentially lower total cost of ownership over the life of the pool, especially when you factor in the hidden costs of chlorine (water turnover, potential damage). This shifts the focus from the initial purchase price to long-term value.
Costs of converting a chlorine pool to salt
Converting a chlorine pool to a salt system is estimated to cost between €1,000 and €2,500. This cost includes the purchase of the chlorinator, professional installation, the initial addition of salt (30 to 50 kg), and verification of the compatibility of existing equipment.
The cost of conversion highlights the importance of material compatibility and the need for professional assessment. This is not a simple addition, but a complete system integration, especially given the risk of corrosion.
Filtration system compatibility and recommendations
Sand filter: The most popular type of filter, compatible with all treatment systems. The sand must be replaced every 3 to 5 years with glass.
Zeolite: A highly porous volcanic mineral, providing finer filtration and requiring less backwashing. Only half the amount of sand is required.
Glass: Made from finely ground recycled glass, it is eco-friendly, attracts positively charged particles, prevents biofilter formation, and lasts up to twice as long as sand. Recommended by Quick Azur for an eco-friendly pool.
Cartridge filter: Highly efficient (captures impurities down to 10 microns compared to 20-40 for sand), saves water (no backwashing), and has a small footprint. It is considered the best choice for an eco-friendly pool.
Pump Sizing: Proper sizing of the filter pump and filter is crucial to prevent damage and ensure efficiency. Variable-speed pumps (e.g., Pentair or Hayward) are recommended to reduce energy consumption.
The choice of disinfection method (salt or chlorine) is interdependent on the filtration system. An effective filtration system, especially with finer media such as glass or cartridge, can reduce the workload of the disinfection system, whether chlorine or salt. This means that optimizing filtration can improve performance and reduce chemical requirements for either system.
Essential Equipment and Brands
Electrolyzers: Key Features and Models
Chlorinators are essential for salt pools. Models vary in volume capacity, salt concentration requirements, and features. Popular models include:
Zodiac Gensalt OT 25: Top of the range, for pools up to 110 m³, durable titanium cell (more than 10,000 hours), easy Quick Fix installation, pH and filtration pump controls, shock chlorination functions and shutter mode.
Zodiac GenSalt OT 25
✅ Highlights
- Ease of use (intuitive box, just one button).
- Self-cleaning cell by polarity inversion (less maintenance).
- Stable chlorine production for swimming pools up to 110 m³.
- Compact format, easy integration into technical rooms.
- Superior bathing comfort, without the classic chlorine odor.
❌ Weak points
- Higher initial investment than conventional chlorination.
- Electrolysis cell expensive to replace after several years.
- Risk of corrosion of metal parts if the salt level is poorly managed.
💬 Reviews & Ratings
- ⭐ 4,3/5 — High-performance and simple solution for automating disinfection. Excellent ease of use; beware of the acquisition cost and long-term cell replacement.
- CCEI Zelia ZLT 50: Good price/performance compromise, for small pools up to 50 m³, compact, easy to install, low salt requirement (3 g/L), 8 production modes.
CCEI Salt Treatment – Zelia ZLT 50
✅ Highlights
- Compact and ergonomic design, ideal for cramped technical rooms.
- “Fun” cell that lights up to indicate the salt level or water temperature.
- Automatic polarity reversal system for constant cell cleaning.
- Simplified installation with integrated flow and temperature sensors.
- Chlorine production that automatically adapts to water temperature and pool cover.
❌ Weak points
- Sometimes it is necessary to oversize the device to ensure sufficient production.
- The cost of a new cell, to be replaced after a few years, can be high.
- The interface, although simple, may require a little patience to master all the features.
- Risk of scaling and corrosion if water quality is not rigorously managed.
💬 Reviews & Ratings
- ⭐ 4.1/5: The CCEI Zelia ZLT 50 is a good electrolyser for those looking for a simple and automated water treatment solution. Its smart design and practical features make everyday life easier, although, like any device of this type, you should anticipate the cost of replacing the cell and size your purchase carefully.
- Bayrol Salt Relax: For 70 m³, 3.3 g/L of salt, integrated pH control, temperature sensor, self-cleaning cell.
BAYROL Salt Relax Pro
✅ Highlights
- Complete automation system for chlorine production and pH regulation.
- Trusted brand in swimming pool water treatment, guaranteeing reliability and quality.
- Simple and intuitive interface, with a large screen for easy reading of settings.
- Optimized safety thanks to automatic shutdown in the event of low flow or over-chlorination.
- Significantly reduces manual maintenance and daily chemical management.
❌ Weak points
- Very high acquisition cost compared to a basic electrolyser.
- Installation is complex and requires professional intervention.
- Requires periodic replacement of pH probes and electrode, which represents a regular maintenance cost.
- Dependence on the entire system in the event of a component failure (probe, pump).
💬 Reviews & Ratings
- ⭐ 4/5: The BAYROL Salt Relax Pro is the ideal solution for pool owners who want complete peace of mind. Its advanced automation and reliability justify its high price. It's a significant investment, but it offers unparalleled user comfort and water quality for those who want to free themselves from maintenance constraints.
- Perle Salt+: For 70 m³, very low salt requirement (1 g/L), automatic chlorine regulator, self-cleaning cell.
SALT+ PEARL
✅ Highlights
- Very easy to use with an intuitive interface and easy installation.
- Efficient and reliable chlorine production for optimal water treatment.
- Compact and robust design, perfect for integrating into any technical room.
- High-performance self-cleaning cell that reduces maintenance frequency.
- Excellent value for money and high user satisfaction.
❌ Weak points
- Initial investment cost, although justified by the savings in chemicals.
- The electrolysis cell is a wearing part that will eventually need to be replaced.
- Requires management of the salt level in the pool, although the device greatly simplifies the task.
💬 Reviews & Ratings
- ⭐ 5/5: The PERLE SALT+ is a near-perfect choice for those looking to transition to salt disinfection without the hassle. Its ease of installation and use, combined with its impressive effectiveness, make it a great investment for fully enjoying your pool with clear, soft water.
- Gre SCG100: For 100 m³, 4 g/L of salt, high chlorine productivity, shock mode.
Gre SCG100
✅ Highlights
- Convenient all-in-one system for simplified maintenance.
- Designed for above-ground pools, quick and easy installation.
- Automated features reduce manual maintenance and chemicals.
- Effective in maintaining clear and disinfected water.
- Compact solution that optimizes the space in the technical room.
❌ Weak points
- Can be undersized for larger pools.
- If one component fails, the entire system is impacted.
- Fewer possibilities for fine adjustments than separate equipment.
💬 Reviews & Ratings
- ⭐ 4/5: The Gre SCG100 is an excellent choice for above-ground pool owners looking for simplicity and efficiency. The 2-in-1 design is very practical and significantly reduces maintenance. Make sure its power matches the size of your pool for optimal use.
- Innowater SMC: Compact, high performance, programmable polarity inversion, easy access to the cell.
Innowater SMC20 Salt Chlorinator
✅ Highlights
- Compact and easy to install, perfect for small or above-ground pools.
- Simple and intuitive digital display for controlling chlorine production.
- Self-cleaning cell by polarity inversion to reduce manual maintenance.
- Effective for recommended water volumes.
❌ Weak points
- Build quality and cell life may fall short of higher-end brands.
- Basic functionality, without automatic pH or chlorine regulation.
- Like any electrolyzer, the electrolysis cell is a wearing part that is expensive to replace.
💬 Reviews & Ratings
- ⭐ 4.1/5: The Innowater SMC20 Salt Chlorinator is a very attractive solution for pool owners. Its excellent value for money makes it a popular choice for automating water disinfection. However, it's crucial to size it correctly for your pool, as its power is limited. A good product that does its job without any frills.
The wide range of chlorinator models and their specific features means that choosing a chlorinator is a nuanced decision that must match the size of the pool, the owner's budget, and the desired level of automation. The integration of pH regulation is a key feature that further enhances automation and comfort, justifying the higher costs.
pH Regulators: Importance and Types
pH regulation is essential for both chlorine and salt pools, but especially for the latter where pH tends to rise. Automatic dosing pumps for pH correction are available. Prices for automatic pH regulators range from €219 to €849 or more for integrated systems.
The cost of an automatic pH regulator (€219-849) adds a significant layer to the overall cost of the system, especially for saltwater pools where it is almost a necessity. To fully realize the "automated" benefits of a saltwater pool, an automatic pH regulator is highly recommended, if not essential. This adds a substantial cost to the initial investment.
Filtration pumps
The filtration pump is the main electricity consumer in a swimming pool. Variable-speed pumps (e.g., Pentair or Hayward) are highly recommended for their energy efficiency, reducing both water and energy consumption.
Brand Reputation and Warranty Information
Zodiac: Renowned for its high-end electrolysers ( Gensalt OT 25 ) and innovation. Typically offers a 2-3 year warranty on new products, with some parts (such as heat pump condensers) benefiting from longer warranties. The warranty covers installations carried out by professionals.
CCEI: Recognized for its reliability, longevity, and innovation in electrical equipment for swimming pools for over 45 years. CCEI electrolysers are generally guaranteed for 2 years.
Bayrol: Specialist in swimming pool water treatment since 1927, a European benchmark for pool hygiene. Bayrol electrolysers come with a 3-year warranty.
Gre: The world leader in above-ground pools, offering quality products at affordable prices. Gre chlorinators generally come with a 2-year warranty.
Hayward/Pentair : Mentioned as benchmark brands for variable speed pumps.
Warranty periods (2-3 years for chlorinators) are relatively short compared to the expected lifespan of a pool. Given the cost of cell replacement (€200-500 every 5-7 years) and the risk of "burning out" the electrodes, long-term reliability and cost of ownership depend heavily on diligent maintenance and the quality of the model chosen, more than the initial warranty. Owners should therefore consider the recurring cost of cell replacement and favor models with durable cells (e.g., Zodiac's 10,000+ hour cell) and self-cleaning features to extend lifespan and reduce maintenance.
User experiences and opinions
User experiences with salt pools:
Comfort: Users describe the experience as "fantastic," "super pleasant on the skin," with a "light salty taste" and "no odor." The system is considered ideal for sensitive skin and eyes, as well as for people with respiratory problems.
Reliability and Maintenance: The system is often perceived as "self-driving" and providing "year-round peace of mind." However, some users report issues with the chlorine display not progressing despite clear water, suggesting that monitoring is still necessary. pH regulation is crucial and often integrated, which is much appreciated. Cell issues and replacement are a known concern.
Cost: The initial investment is perceived as “more expensive to buy.”
User experiences with chlorine pools:
Effectiveness: The water is described as "clear" and the chlorine as "all-eradicating."
Cons: Users report that the water is "odorous" and "irritating to the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes," with a "feeling like bathing in a bottle of bleach." Chlorine also tends to "discolor" fabrics.
Maintenance: Maintenance requires regular attention. Low chlorine levels despite added product are common, often due to heavy use, sun/heat, or incorrect pH/stabilizer. Direct contact with pebbles can damage liners.
User feedback strongly supports the comfort benefits of salt systems, making them an attractive choice for families and sensitive individuals. However, reported issues with the chlorine display on salt systems and the critical need for pH regulation underscore that even “automated” systems require monitoring and understanding to ensure optimal performance.
For chlorine, the "irritant" and "odor" aspects are constantly reported, reinforcing the disadvantage in terms of comfort.
Recommendations based on different user profiles
General preference: Salt pools with electrolysers are increasingly preferred for family use, efficient filtration and optimal comfort.
For budget-conscious users (Initial Cost): Chlorine is more economical to install.
For comfort-oriented users: Salt is superior due to the lack of odor, irritation, and a softer water feel.
For those looking for low maintenance: Salt systems are highly recommended due to their automation, especially with automatic pH regulation. However, this shifts maintenance to periodic monitoring and cleaning of the cell.
For eco-conscious users: Salt is preferred due to its natural, biodegradable nature and reduced reliance on packaged chemicals.
Conversion: It is entirely possible to switch from a chlorine pool to a salt pool, ideally after the wintering period.
The “ideal” system is subjective and depends heavily on the owner’s priorities. This includes budget (initial versus long-term), maintenance preference (manual versus automated monitoring), chemical sensitivity, and environmental impact. This perspective reinforces the report’s goal of providing a comprehensive comparison for personalized decision-making.
Conclusion on salt or chlorine pools
Choosing between a salt water pool and a chlorine pool is an important decision that affects not only budget, but also maintenance time, swimming comfort, and environmental impact. There is no universally "best" solution, but rather the one that best suits each owner's priorities and lifestyle.
For owners who are concerned about the initial budget and willing to invest in regular manual maintenance, chlorine remains a viable option. However, it is imperative to understand the requirements of rigorous water parameter management (pH, TAC, stabilizer) to avoid irritation, unpleasant odors, and costly damage to the pool liner. Investing in automatic liquid chlorine dosing pumps can alleviate some of this manual burden.
For those who prioritize superior swimming comfort, simplified maintenance, and a more environmentally friendly approach, a salt chlorination system is the most appropriate choice. Although the initial investment is higher, annual product costs are generally lower, and the swimming experience is significantly gentler on the skin and eyes. It is crucial to incorporate an automatic pH regulator to manage the natural tendency of pH to rise and to ensure the compatibility of pool materials to prevent corrosion.
Regardless of the method chosen, filtration quality is a fundamental pillar. Investing in high-performance filtration systems (such as glass media or cartridge filters) and energy-efficient variable-speed pumps will significantly improve water clarity and reduce the workload of the sanitizer, thus optimizing the overall efficiency of the pool.
Ultimately, the key to a pleasant and healthy pool lies in consistent maintenance and a thorough understanding of the chosen system. Regular monitoring of water parameters, proper equipment maintenance, and, if necessary, hiring professionals for installation or complex diagnostics will ensure years of swimming pleasure. The final decision is a lifestyle investment, balancing the initial investment with ongoing effort, personal comfort, and environmental values.
Other articles on swimming pools
Finding the ideal pool robot is often a compromise between power, features and budget.